Document Actions
Drawbacks of YouTube Profit-Sharing
BusinessWeek's Catherine Holahan writes that while content creators take in cash from deals with online video sites, they may lose out by signing away the rights to their work.
HappySlip's Christine Gambito
The money from profit-sharing schemes can be an added bonus for amateur videographers, but Holahan says that once an online video star is successful (like HappySlip's Christine Gambito or Ze Frank), there is more money to be made from hosting the content on a separate site and selling ads against it.
That's not to say that the YouTubes of the world are not important.
Their ability to aggregate millions of videos makes them a destination
for the mass audiences so coveted by independent—and often
unknown—creators. It's a first step to grabbing audience and then ad
dollars. The sites' considerable traffic also helps the sites broker
deals with large marketing firms that an independent creator with an
audience of only 5,000 individuals a day—Gambito, for instance—would
have difficulty getting on the phone. "Brands don't even want to go
through the effort of the legal stuff unless they can spend $200 grand
at once," says Frank, adding that a site with several thousand
dedicated viewers won't grab that kind of cash.
At the same time, the ad revenue these sites share often can't compare with the amount creators could get if they built their own sites into destinations complete with advertising and merchandise.