Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

The Daily Reel

November 19, 2006
Advanced Search…
Join
Sections
  • Home
  • Top Ten
  • News & Opinion
    • News
    • Blogs
  • Spotlight
    • Coffee Break
    • Music
    • Politics
    • Commercials
    • Web Series
    • TV
  • Reelfest
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contacts
Top Ten RSS
Fan (A Love Story)
Let's Build a Fire
Le Montage
SAND
Flipper Nation Promo
Homeland Security
Daikon with Ginger Sesame Miso Sauce... and stop action animation
Self Defense
Why Walk 1000 Miles?
The Country
 
Document Actions
  • Send this page to somebody
  • Print this page
  • Post to del.icio.us
  • Digg This!

Striking Distance: Will Online Video Shut Down Hollywood?

Average Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 ( 0 votes)
Click to change your rating: (not rated)
  worthless bad average good great
Written by Anthony Kaufman October 24, 2006

There is a storm brewing over the online video industry. As has been reported recently in particular pockets of the worrisome media, it could blow up in a major way over the next 21 months.


That's when the Writers Guild of America and the Screen Actors Guild renew their contracts (Oct. 31, 2007 and July 2008, respectively), and when these artists -- who produce much of what we love to watch online and off -- will demand a piece of the newly exploding digital revenue pie. "Gone is the entente cordiale that has long kept labor peace," write Jill Goldsmith and Dave McNary in a front-page story in Variety. "What worries Hollywood's guilds is … the prospect that they won't get their fair share of revenue from such outlets as digital downloads."

In another article published in the Los Angeles Times on October 19, "Residuals Debate: Old Script on New Set," staff writer Richard Verrier explains that standard Hollywood labor contracts are vague about payments for films and TV shows that appear on the web. "Actors and writers now make pocket change from downloading because the business is new," he writes, noting that a strike could take place. "In many cases, talent isn't paid at all because the download is considered promotional for a show."

Labeling streamed content "promotional" is a clever way for corporations to get around paying their creators. But unlike most promotional material, the entertainment companies are not spending money, but making money off these deals. Does CBS, for instance, which shares revenue from advertising sponsorships of its content provided to YouTube, also share that revenue with the stars, writers and directors behind that content?

When another video revolution – the arrival of VHS tape – hit the entertainment industry several years back, a revaluation of residuals had to take place. And you can bet this time around that artists are going to fight even harder to be a profitable part of this latest technological shift.

Greed Over Common Sense

Posted by Michael Christiansen at October 25, 2006
Youtube is youtube, films are films. This is just another excuse to make more money for these greedy pigs. How can someone collect royalties off of an Mpeg-4 that looks poor in quality? Once the actors' agents start negotiating, they will collect royalties, which we will have to then pay for. And most of us use Youtube for its intended purpose, to display our own videos at no cost for the world to see. The conglomerates and corporations will always be afraid when the masses find a new medium which threatens their existence, but in the end, we are surrounded by media, propaganda, and bullshit. People just don't care enough to do anything about it, they have too much to lose. Piracy happens. You're still filthy rich. So let it be.
Submit a video to The Daily Reel
 
  • Site Map
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards:

  • Section 508
  • WCAG
  • Valid XHTML
  • Valid CSS
  • Usable in any browser