Document Actions
  • Print this page
  • Sphere

Tyrus Thomas Playoff Dunk

Charles Atkinson
Posted April 27, 2007

With all of the attention that Brandon R.O.Y. Roy is getting, I don't feel as though Tyrus Thomas is getting his due credit. If you ask me, there are two reasons why everyone thinks that Roy is the rookie of the year:

1) Roy's playing for one of the crappiest teams in the league, so it's easier for him to stuff the stat sheet.

2) Everyone already decided he's the rookie of the year, and once the media gets snowballing, it's hard to stop the avalanche.

But quite frankly, Thomas seems to be the better, although possibly more raw, athlete. In the limited action I've seen him in, I have to say that his athleticism is phenomenal. I've seen him sky up for blocks that a 7-footer would have trouble reaching and this alley-oop seen here, against one of my least favorite teams in the league, is nothing short of spectacular.

Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on May 09. 2007 False No user image
Rookie of the Year isn't decided by athleticism.

Not all champion teams have the best athletes, it's about teamwork.

The Blazers are a young team, and obviously in the rebuilding stage. The celtics suck, that doesnt mean anything, they were once amazing. All teams go through stages, look at the Bulls, they are finally on the way up now from their long rebuild. The cavs, the Lakers are going through a rebuild. Does that mean that Kobe is no good because he plays on the Lakers, who don't have a great record?

Just because you play on a bad team doesn't make it easier to stuff your stat sheet, if anything, it makes it harder, because you have all the weight on your shoulders.

You're a genius.
Posted by Charles Atkinson on May 01. 2007 Charles Atkinson
Sheish, tough crowd. Looks like Barkley isn't the only Chuck taking some heat right now.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on May 01. 2007 False No user image
I think he had enough, so let’s all point at Charles and laugh :)
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on April 30. 2007 False No user image
Youre right, Thomas is an incredible athlete...... The fact you took the time to post this non-sense is what amazes me. You obviously have a love for basketball, enough to formulate an opinion and make it public; the problem is....you couldn't be more off base. One of the most ridiculous garbage riddin pieces of logic i've ever expended the time to read. Have you seen any Blazer games in the 2006/2007 season? Have you seen a basketball game period?
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on April 30. 2007 False No user image
thanks to roy the trail blazers are no longer the worst team in the league, oh and by the way, aldridge is better than thomas.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on April 29. 2007 False No user image
Charles, no offense, but you don't seem very smart. So what you're saying is The NBA Rookie of the Year Award should go the rookie who can jump the best. You said it yourself, Thomas is RAW. That means he needs time to put it all together. Guys that need time to put it all together aren't R.O.Y., when there are guys out there like Brandon Roy who DON'T need time to put it all together. Seems pretty clear to me.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on April 29. 2007 False No user image
YOUR A TOTAL DOUCHEBAG....AND YOU WILL SOON REGRET YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT THE BLAZERS BEING THE CRAPPIEST TEAM IN THE LEAGUE.....YOU LIKE THOSE UPSTART BULLS SO MUCH THEN GET USED TO SEEING THEM, CAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE BLAZERS WILL BE IN A COUPLE OF YEARS....BE AFRAID! BE VERY AFRAID!!!
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on April 28. 2007 False No user image
Are you kidding me? The fact you are even entertaining the idea of Thomas should be R.O.Y over Roy, based on his athleticism, is mind blowing. Sure, Roy played on a bad team and has minutes. Um, that was intended. Thomas couldn't even get minutes till some on the Bulls got hurt. Why? Because he wasn't impressing the staff enough to get minutes. Sure, say they had a ton of players ahead of him, but if he was so athletic and should have been a R.O.Y candidate, then he would have gotten more minutes.

The fact is, Roy is a better all around player, that took advantage of his opportunity to start and play. He became the glue for the Blazers. He exceeded everyone's expectations, while missing about 24 games this year. Thomas wasn't considered because he hasn't shown enough, nor proven enough. Athleticism gets you so far, look at Travis Outlaw. If you are basing you case for Thomas on that, then Travis should have won it his rookie year.

Next time, do a bit more homework before making such a claim. Roy is the R.O.Y for a reason, because he was just better then everyone else.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on April 28. 2007 False No user image
You must be crazy. To believe that a player is better just because of his potential and not what he has done, or can do, on the court is ludicrous.
Roy has a much better basketball mind. Can finish a game and puts teams away. He can't jump as high as Thomas, no, but his game is so much more multi-dimensional than Thomas'.
Even if he was on another, better, team, Roy would still be the top rookie in the league.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on April 28. 2007 False No user image
Alley opp all alone under the hoop. Get for real
Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: