Document Actions

Michael Moore and Wolf Blitzer Butt Heads

Liz Miller
Posted July 10, 2007

I belong to that class of liberals who find themselves vaguely embarrassed to have Michael Moore on their side; sure, his tenacity is admirable, and no one can deny the role he's had in revolutionizing the once-dry documentary genre. But when he gets into one of his rants on national television -- no matter how well-justified -- I just want to cower under the covers.

In this clip from CNN's The Situation Room, Moore is infuriated by a piece critiquing some of his facts in Sicko and explodes, demanding that Blitzer apologize for misleading the American public with similar critiques of Fahrenheit 9/11. It's impressive to see Blitzer stand calmly in the face of Moore's tirade, telling Moore that "We wanted to interview you. That's what we do on television," before regaining control of the conversation with specific and interesting questions.

Moore's ranting about CNN's biases is unfocused and rambling, and he definitely doesn't end the interview with any sort of dignity. However, when the interview concludes with Lou Dobbs smirking, "He's more of a left-wing promoter than Hugo Chavez," it's hard not to see his point.

Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below.

Because you are not logged in, your comment will be credited to 'Anonymous Scaredy Cat'.

(Required)
(Required)
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on July 12. 2007 False No user image
Listening to Michael Moore's fears about being taped, edited, and later being taken out of context was the most egregious exercise in hypocrisy I've ever seen. Of course, he should know. That's exactly what he does for a living.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on July 10. 2007 False No user image
I belong to that class of liberals who find themselves vaguely embarassed to have people on their side who find Michael Moore embarassing.

He was right to be infuriated by the slanted opening piece which managed to both paint him as a liar and avoid any meaningful discussion the issue at hand. And he was right to take Blitzer to task for the prior interview's slant -- this is not the kind of thing you pretend doesn't matter.

I'll take Moore's righteous (and I don't use that word pejoratively) bomb-throwing over the usual TV liberal's respectful but meaningless banter anyday.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on July 10. 2007 False No user image
Michael Moore was focused, dignified and absolutely correct on every point.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on July 10. 2007 False No user image
I saw SiCKo shortly before seeing the CNN interview yesterday. I was very disappointed in CNN's "counter-piece". It was blatantly an attempt to find faults in the film, and did a horrible and misleading job of doing so. The worst was when they faulted Moore's portrayal of Cuba's healthcare system by "pointing out" that Cuba was ranked two spots below the US in healthcare rankings. As if this somehow points to a lack of truth in Moore's facts. Cuba is a poor, dictator-run country subject to a trade embargo with its biggest economic neighbor and ranks only two spots behind the US in healthcare - and we are supposed to feel good about this? Blitzer and CNN deserved to get burned by Moore because of that alone, not to mention the other "crap" they said that Moore subsequently proved incorrect on his website posting within hours of the piece. I hope he gives them even more hell tonight.
Posted by An Anonymous Scaredy-Cat on July 10. 2007 False No user image
I think you are dead wrong on this one. His response was refreshing.
Mikes movie is truthful. Rather than start with a counter piece (why do they always feel the need to do these), it would have been better had Wolf let Mike talk about the movie and have him expand on things that could have been added. I hate counter pieces simply designed to search for differences or omissions. They could have just as easily done one on the major points he gets right in the film and then discuss those in more detail.

Dan Murphy
Posted by Spencer Somers on July 10. 2007 Spencer Somers
I wasn't totally wild about Sicko, but it is kind of sad that indignation on the left is portrayed as psycho, and on the right it's portrayed as passionate. I feel like Ann Coulter almost gets off easier than Moore. He's damned right about CNN, but CNN is pandering in the way that the Democrats have been for years. They're taking what Fox did so well, which was making the news entertaining (if false), and doing it worse to siphon their audience. It's such a common mistake in the media and politics, instead of recognizing originality, and ambition, to duplicate and pander. And like a copy of a copy, it's always worse. That's why you get Flash Gordon after Star Wars, and John Kerry. I may not always like how you say what you say, Michael Moore, but please don't stop saying it.
Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: